Close

This function is only available to subscribers. Find out more HERE or log in below

Forgotten details?

Dont have an account?Sign up here

  • Log In
  • Sign Up
  • RSS
  • Paul Waugh | Google's Eric Schmidt not backing down on v strong defence of strict legal/moral...

    source icon

    14:55Paul Waugh

    TWITTER

    Google's Eric Schmidt not backing down on v strong defence of strict legal/moral split on tax. Lots of company exes watching PR operation.

  • Moving and distressing visit to refugee registration centre in Jordan. Saw first...

    source icon

    14:48William Hague

    TWITTER

    Moving and distressing visit to refugee registration centre in Jordan. Saw first hand the impact of the #Syria conflict on children

  • Michael White | Ed Mil's Google conference attack today was impressive, Eric Schmidt's "we obey ...

    source icon

    14:42Michael White

    TWITTER

    Ed Mil's Google conference attack today was impressive, Eric Schmidt's "we obey tax rules" line less so. Self-deception is no excuse

  • Sunny Hundal | Victory! Govt u-turns on Afghan interpreters and plans to offer them asylum

    source icon

    14:06Liberal Conspiracy

    BLOG

    The government has decided to offer around 600 Afghan interpreters a chance to settle in Britain, it is being reported today.

  • Will @Ed_Miliband accept money from new super-union after PCS voted for merger t...

    source icon

    13:53Greg Hands

    TWITTER

    Will @Ed_Miliband accept money from new super-union after PCS voted for merger talks with Unite today? #unionpuppet #sameoldLabour

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

  • PoliticsHome | Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers

    03:05 Sign up to see last 24 hours

    PoliticsHome

    Only the latest five entries on the PhiWire are visible to non-subscribers, Sign up to see last 24 hours

PoliticsHome. All Todays Politics In One Place

  • Home
  • Category Hub
  • Culture & Media
  • Home Affairs
  • Economy & Work
  • Education
  • Energy & Environment
  • Foreign & Defence
  • Health & Care
  • Local & Regional
  • Party Politics
  • Transport
  • PH PRO
  • On The GO
  • About Us
  • Contact Us/Help
  • Central Lobby
  • Member Directory
  • Waugh Room
  • The House Magazine
  • Political Pulse
  • Story Tracker
  • Today's Events
  • The Green Box
  • Today's Top Ten
  • Today's Front Pages
  • Newsmakers
  • Dot Commons' Diary
  • You are here:
  • Central Lobby/ Article Detail

Education minister borrows Commons speech from Wikipedia

Bookmark and Share

Member News

Big Innovation Centre responds to Vince Cable’s speech on Intellectual Property and growth

Consultation: Patents, trade marks and design rights: Groundless threats

Law Society welcomes government proposals to simplify the law


By Ned Simons
- 16th May 2011

Further education minister John Hayes appears to have lifted a major section of a speech delivered in the House of Commons from Wikipedia.

On Friday Tory MP Nadhim Zahawi was promoting his private members bill that would create an extra bank holiday to allow the English and Welsh to celebrate St George's Day and St David's Day.

Responsibility for responding for the government fell to Hayes, who is minister of state for further education, skills and lifelong learning.

But his potted history of bank holidays appeared to be lifted almost word for word from the internet encyclopaedia - not exactly a glowing example for students.

Hayes Speech

Wikipedia

Before 1834, the Bank observed about 33 saints’ days and religious festivals as holidays, but in 1834 the number was reduced to just four: 1 May, 1 November or All Saints day, Good Friday and Christmas day.

Prior to 1834, the Bank of England observed about thirty-three saints' days and religious festivals as holidays, but in 1834, this was reduced to just four: 1 May (May Day), 1 November (All Saints Day), Good Friday, and Christmas Day

Frankly, in my view, that was rather a meagre ration.

..

In 1871, the first legislation relating to bank holidays was passed when the banker and politician, Sir John Lubbock, introduced the Bank Holidays Act 1871, which specified the days as holidays.

In 1871, the first legislation relating to bank holidays was passed when Liberal Politician and Banker, Sir John Lubbock introduced the Bank Holidays Act 1871 which specified the days in the table set out below.

I understand that Sir John Lubbock was an enthusiastic supporter of national and local cricket, and was firmly of the belief that bank employees should have the opportunity to participate in and attend matches when they were scheduled. Dates of bank holidays are therefore dates when cricket games were traditionally played between villages in the area where Sir John was raised.

Sir John was an enthusiastic supporter of cricket and was firmly of the belief that bank employees should have the opportunity to participate in and attend matches when they were scheduled. Included in the dates of bank holidays are therefore dates when cricket games were traditionally played between the villages in the region where Sir John was raised.[citation needed]

It is that rather partisan approach to bank holidays, built around Sir John’s personal tastes, which forms the basis, or at least the origins, of the matters we are speaking of today.

..

Nevertheless, people were so glad to be given time off, whether it was to watch cricket or not, they called the first bank holidays St Lubbock’s days for a while.

The English people were so thankful that they called the first Bank Holidays 'St. Lubbock's Days' for a while.[3]

That did not perpetuate, but I hope that politicians of note might consider that, at least in popular if not official terms, special days could be named after them; one never knows, but if my hon. Friend’s Bill were to be successful, his name might, at least colloquially, be attached to the day’s holiday that people enjoyed. However, that rather self-interested motive of course has nothing to do with his bringing the Bill to our attention.

..

As is often the case, Scotland was treated separately because of its separate traditions, and so, for example, new year’s day was a holiday there whereas Boxing day was not.

Scotland was treated separately because of its separate traditions; for example, New Year is a more important holiday there.[citation needed]

The 1871 Act did not specify Good Friday and Christmas day as bank holidays in England, Walesand Ireland because they were already recognised as common law holidays, and common observance had meant that they had become customary holidays since before records began.

The act did not specify Good Friday and Christmas Day as bank holidays in England, Walesand Ireland because they were already recognised as common law holidays, and because of common observance, they became customary holidays since before records began.

Exactly a century after the 1871 Act, the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971, which currently regulates bank holidays in the UK, was passed. The majority of the current bank holidays were specified in the 1971 Act, but holidays for new year’s day in England, Wales and Northern Irelandand for May day were introduced later.

Exactly a century after the 1871 Act, the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971, which currently regulates bank holidays in the UK, was passed. The majority of the current bank holidays were specified in the 1971 Act, but New Year's Day and May Day were introduced after 1971.

Under the 1971 Act, certain holidays are written into legislation. Those which are not are proclaimed each year by the legal device of a royal proclamation. A royal proclamation is also used to move bank holidays that would otherwise fall on a weekend, so adding an additional one-off holiday, as was the case this year. In that way, holidays are not lost in years when they coincide with weekends.

Under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971, bank holidays are proclaimed each year by the legal device of a royal proclamation. Royal proclamation is also used to move bank holidays that would otherwise fall on a weekend. In this way, public holidays are not 'lost' in years when they coincide with weekends.

These deferred bank holidays are termed bank holidays in lieu of the typical anniversary date and in the legislation are known as “substitute days”.

These deferred bank holiday days are termed a 'bank holiday in lieu' of the typical anniversary date. In the legislation they are known as 'substitute days'.

Although we have fewer public or bank holidays than many other European Union member states, they do not always have substitute days and so, in some sense, the comparison is misleading.

The number of holidays in the UKis relatively small compared to that in many other European countries. However, direct comparison is inaccurate since the 'substitute day' scheme of deferment does not apply in most European countries, where holidays that coincide with a weekend (29% of fixed-date holidays) are 'lost'. In fact, the average number of non-weekend holidays in such countries is only marginally higher (and in some cases lower) than the UK.

Fridays are a particularly quiet day in the Commons as most MPs have left Westminster for their constituencies – perhaps Hayes (or his speechwriter) thought no one would be watching.

The plagarised part of the speech came during a section which the minister said had been prepared for him to read out to MPs by officials.

Hayes' biography on the departmental website show he is an honorary member of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers the lists his interests as including English poetry and prose.

Are you keeping track of bills in Parliament? Why not let our Dods Legislation service take the hassle and complexity out of legislation monitoring?

Visit www.dodslegislation.com/login to get started.

Bookmark and Share

Article Comments

Many of the comments above reveal a misunderstanding of the issues here. They conflate plagiarism and copyright, and misunderstand the latter as it applies to Wikipedia. In the realm of thoughts and ideas and debate, if you quote from somewhere you are morally obliged to acknowledge the source of your information instead of passing it off as your own work. This is regardless of any considerations of copyright. If I went to a (poorly-read) publisher with the text of a Dickens novel and said 'look at this story I've written' I would be behaving unethically despite Dickens' prose no longer being subject to copyright because of its age.

As far as copyright goes, Wikipedia's text belongs to whoever wrote it, and by submitting it to the site they agree to license it for public re-use according to the terms of the CC-BY-SA. The text of this licence is linked to in the footer at the bottom of every Wikipedia article. Briefly, it permits you to use as much of Wikipedia's content as you want, for any purpose including commercial, and even to modify it or build on it. In return you are required to credit the author and to make clear to your own audience that what you are presenting to them is itself available under the terms of the CC-BY-SA.

It seems to me that Hayes is both a plagiarist and copyright violator in this case. Certainly he would not get away with lifting material unacknowledged like this if he was publishing a book or submitting a piece of work in an academic setting. He is responsible for the actions of his speechwriters. He owes an apology to the authors of the text he passed off as his own for plagiarising their work and violating the terms of the licence they have generously granted, and he owes an apology to the Commons for his dishonesty.

David
22nd May 2011 at 5:57 pm

Perhaps this explains recent parliamentary decisions to permit the use of iPads in the chamber. Perhaps it is a promotional exercise for Apple.

guy
18th May 2011 at 7:13 am

Wikipedia is a pompous organisation populated by pompous people who have very little to do. It gets its information from everybody and anybody and then tries to claim copyright on it.

How on earth can Wikipedia enforce its ''copyright''? Every school child would be in court for nicking copy for their homework.

Please grow up. Wikipedia is a hobby, nothing more.

Mitch
17th May 2011 at 12:15 pm

Fae, this minister has civil servants and advisers to write speeches for him. Is just lifting from the page of Wikipedia what they are paid to do, especially when the page they are taking text from contains health warnings as to its validity - citation needed etc...

Parliamentary Insider
16th May 2011 at 3:18 pm

Bokken, CC-BY-SA applies to redistribution of the text of Wikipedia. This is a live speech (rather than a publication) that paraphrases some parts of a Wikipedia article. Reuse of partial extracts in a live speech is not unambiguously covered by the policy given in Wikipedia's guidance at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REUSE. CC-BY-SA applies to derivatives and so one might argue that the printed version of this speech ought to include an attribution (if you accept that these paraphrased extracts are a derivative) but there would be no need to explain attribution during the speech itself.

Fae
16th May 2011 at 3:02 pm

In addition to the below, the article he quoted from isn't even particularly well sourced. It even has a flag stating that one section does not cite a single reference or source.

Thom
16th May 2011 at 2:55 pm

@Fae Wikipedia does indeed 'neatly provide all the facts in a well structured form' but its Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license requires - as the name suggests - attribution. Where was this given?

Andy Mabbett
16th May 2011 at 2:49 pm

Fae, you are wrong. There is no barrier to re-use text form Wikipedia *as long as you acknowledge the source*, which was obviously not the case.

Bokken
16th May 2011 at 1:23 pm

There are no copyright issues with him reusing text from Wikipedia and there is no claim that anything was incorrect. It appears that he has saved the taxpayer a few quid by using his time to do more important things than crafting original prose when Wikipedia neatly provides all the facts in a well structured form.

Fae
16th May 2011 at 1:15 pm





  • Home
    • Central Lobby
    • Member Directory
    • Waugh Room
    • The House Magazine
    • Political Pulse
    • Story Tracker
    • Today's Events
    • The Green Box
    • Today's Top Ten
    • Today's Front Pages
    • Newsmakers
    • Dot Commons' Diary
  • Category Hub
  • Culture & Media
    • Communications
    • Gambling
    • Licensing
    • Media/Phone hacking
    • Olympics
    • Sport
    • The Arts
  • Home Affairs
    • Voluntary Sector
    • Social Issues
    • Civil Liberties & Counter Terrorism
    • Emergency Services
    • Equality
    • Immigration
    • Law, Justice & Prisons
    • Science & Technology
  • Economy & Work
    • British Business
    • Construction
    • Consumers
    • Indicators
    • Employment
    • Financial Services
    • Food & Drink
    • Insurance
    • Manufacturing
    • Public Sector Finances
    • Retail Sector
    • Tax
    • Trade unions
    • Utilities
    • Welfare
  • Education
    • Children
    • Further & Higher Education
    • Schools
    • Skills & Training
  • Energy & Environment
    • Agriculture
    • Animals
    • Energy Policy
    • Energy Sources
    • Environment
  • Foreign & Defence
    • Middle East
    • The Americas
    • US News
    • Iraq
    • Iran
    • Afghanistan
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Defence
    • Europe & EU
    • International development
    • International news
  • Health & Care
    • Disability
    • Health Professionals
    • NHS
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Public Health
    • Social Care
  • Local & Regional
    • Northern Ireland
    • Planning
    • Scotland
    • Wales
    • Communities
    • Housing
    • Local Government
    • London
  • Party Politics
    • Public Administration
    • SNP
    • UKIP
    • Political System
    • Political & Constitutional reform
    • BNP
    • Conservative Party
    • Gossip & Rumour
    • Green Party
    • Labour Party
    • Liberal Democrats
    • Opinion Polls
    • Parliament
    • Plaid Cymru
  • Transport
    • Air Transport
    • Buses
    • Rail Transport
    • Road Transport
    • Transport Policy
  • PH PRO
    • Lobby Briefings
    • Press Releases
    • Transcripts
    • House of Commons
    • On Air Today
    • PH Pro
    • My Dashboard
    • My Calendar
    • My Settings
  • On The GO
    • Edit my emails
  • About Us
    • Our Clients
    • Opinion Research
    • Advertising
    • Who We Are
    • Sign Up today!
  • Contact Us/Help
    • Contact Us
    • Help
    • FAQs
  • Utility
    • Log In
    • Sign Up
    • RSS
    • Find Your MP
    • Mobile
  • Archives
    • Central Lobby Members Archive
    • MP Articles Archive
    • Peer Articles Archive
  • © 2012 PoliticsHome
    • Twitter
    • MP Directory
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Central Lobby Terms & Conditions