By Ned Simons - 16th May 2011
Further education minister John Hayes appears to have lifted a major section of a speech delivered in the House of Commons from Wikipedia.
On Friday Tory MP Nadhim Zahawi was promoting his private members bill that would create an extra bank holiday to allow the English and Welsh to celebrate St George's Day and St David's Day.
Responsibility for responding for the government fell to Hayes, who is minister of state for further education, skills and lifelong learning.
But his potted history of bank holidays appeared to be lifted almost word for word from the internet encyclopaedia - not exactly a glowing example for students.
|
Before 1834, the Bank observed about 33 saints’ days and religious festivals as holidays, but in 1834 the number was reduced to just four: 1 May, 1 November or All Saints day, Good Friday and Christmas day. |
Prior to 1834, the Bank of England observed about thirty-three saints' days and religious festivals as holidays, but in 1834, this was reduced to just four: 1 May (May Day), 1 November (All Saints Day), Good Friday, and Christmas Day |
|
Frankly, in my view, that was rather a meagre ration. |
.. |
|
In 1871, the first legislation relating to bank holidays was passed when the banker and politician, Sir John Lubbock, introduced the Bank Holidays Act 1871, which specified the days as holidays. |
In 1871, the first legislation relating to bank holidays was passed when Liberal Politician and Banker, Sir John Lubbock introduced the Bank Holidays Act 1871 which specified the days in the table set out below. |
|
I understand that Sir John Lubbock was an enthusiastic supporter of national and local cricket, and was firmly of the belief that bank employees should have the opportunity to participate in and attend matches when they were scheduled. Dates of bank holidays are therefore dates when cricket games were traditionally played between villages in the area where Sir John was raised. |
Sir John was an enthusiastic supporter of cricket and was firmly of the belief that bank employees should have the opportunity to participate in and attend matches when they were scheduled. Included in the dates of bank holidays are therefore dates when cricket games were traditionally played between the villages in the region where Sir John was raised.[citation needed] |
|
It is that rather partisan approach to bank holidays, built around Sir John’s personal tastes, which forms the basis, or at least the origins, of the matters we are speaking of today. |
.. |
|
Nevertheless, people were so glad to be given time off, whether it was to watch cricket or not, they called the first bank holidays St Lubbock’s days for a while. |
The English people were so thankful that they called the first Bank Holidays 'St. Lubbock's Days' for a while.[3] |
|
That did not perpetuate, but I hope that politicians of note might consider that, at least in popular if not official terms, special days could be named after them; one never knows, but if my hon. Friend’s Bill were to be successful, his name might, at least colloquially, be attached to the day’s holiday that people enjoyed. However, that rather self-interested motive of course has nothing to do with his bringing the Bill to our attention. |
.. |
|
As is often the case,
|
|
|
The 1871 Act did not specify Good Friday and Christmas day as bank holidays in |
The act did not specify Good Friday and Christmas Day as bank holidays in |
|
Exactly a century after the 1871 Act, the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971, which currently regulates bank holidays in the |
Exactly a century after the 1871 Act, the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971, which currently regulates bank holidays in the |
|
Under the 1971 Act, certain holidays are written into legislation. Those which are not are proclaimed each year by the legal device of a royal proclamation. A royal proclamation is also used to move bank holidays that would otherwise fall on a weekend, so adding an additional one-off holiday, as was the case this year. In that way, holidays are not lost in years when they coincide with weekends. |
Under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971, bank holidays are proclaimed each year by the legal device of a royal proclamation. Royal proclamation is also used to move bank holidays that would otherwise fall on a weekend. In this way, public holidays are not 'lost' in years when they coincide with weekends. |
|
These deferred bank holidays are termed bank holidays in lieu of the typical anniversary date and in the legislation are known as “substitute days”. |
These deferred bank holiday days are termed a 'bank holiday in lieu' of the typical anniversary date. In the legislation they are known as 'substitute days'. |
|
Although we have fewer public or bank holidays than many other European Union member states, they do not always have substitute days and so, in some sense, the comparison is misleading. |
The number of holidays in the |
Fridays are a particularly quiet day in the Commons as most MPs have left Westminster for their constituencies – perhaps Hayes (or his speechwriter) thought no one would be watching.
The plagarised part of the speech came during a section which the minister said had been prepared for him to read out to MPs by officials.
Hayes' biography on the departmental website show he is an honorary member of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers the lists his interests as including English poetry and prose.
Are you keeping track of bills in Parliament? Why not let our Dods Legislation service take the hassle and complexity out of legislation monitoring?
Visit www.dodslegislation.com/login to get started.
Article Comments
Perhaps this explains recent parliamentary decisions to permit the use of iPads in the chamber. Perhaps it is a promotional exercise for Apple.
guy
18th May 2011 at 7:13 am
Wikipedia is a pompous organisation populated by pompous people who have very little to do. It gets its information from everybody and anybody and then tries to claim copyright on it.
How on earth can Wikipedia enforce its ''copyright''? Every school child would be in court for nicking copy for their homework.
Please grow up. Wikipedia is a hobby, nothing more.
Mitch
17th May 2011 at 12:15 pm
Fae, this minister has civil servants and advisers to write speeches for him. Is just lifting from the page of Wikipedia what they are paid to do, especially when the page they are taking text from contains health warnings as to its validity - citation needed etc...
Parliamentary Insider
16th May 2011 at 3:18 pm
Bokken, CC-BY-SA applies to redistribution of the text of Wikipedia. This is a live speech (rather than a publication) that paraphrases some parts of a Wikipedia article. Reuse of partial extracts in a live speech is not unambiguously covered by the policy given in Wikipedia's guidance at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REUSE. CC-BY-SA applies to derivatives and so one might argue that the printed version of this speech ought to include an attribution (if you accept that these paraphrased extracts are a derivative) but there would be no need to explain attribution during the speech itself.
Fae
16th May 2011 at 3:02 pm
In addition to the below, the article he quoted from isn't even particularly well sourced. It even has a flag stating that one section does not cite a single reference or source.
Thom
16th May 2011 at 2:55 pm
@Fae Wikipedia does indeed 'neatly provide all the facts in a well structured form' but its Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license requires - as the name suggests - attribution. Where was this given?
Andy Mabbett
16th May 2011 at 2:49 pm
Fae, you are wrong. There is no barrier to re-use text form Wikipedia *as long as you acknowledge the source*, which was obviously not the case.
Bokken
16th May 2011 at 1:23 pm
There are no copyright issues with him reusing text from Wikipedia and there is no claim that anything was incorrect. It appears that he has saved the taxpayer a few quid by using his time to do more important things than crafting original prose when Wikipedia neatly provides all the facts in a well structured form.
Fae
16th May 2011 at 1:15 pm
David
22nd May 2011 at 5:57 pm